On 27.10.14 15:29, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > On 10/26/2014 9:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> This option doesn't exist in upstream kernels, does it? Why not just >>>> >>make it dtb-y? >>> > >>> >CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE is being added one hunk above.:) >> Oops:). >> >> I'm not convinced we need a config option just for the sake of >> compiling a device tree though. >> >> >> Alex >> > > Eventually, we would add other device driver selections when > CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE=y. At this point, those drivers are still not ready.
Could you please give me some examples of drivers that would depend on CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE? I like the current way things work without the need for such an option, where everything's implemented purely as drivers you can opt in our out of. You don't have a CONFIG_ARCH_SB7XX on x86 either, right? ;) Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/