On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Antoine Tenart
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Maybe the of_pinctrl_utils_node_is_mux/config() solution is more
> appropriate to avoid having a confusing function. Plus we would have a
> dedicated of_pinctrl_utils_read_pins() function.
>
> I think I prefer the second solution because it could avoid some
> confusion and the logic would stay in the pinctrl core functions.
>
> I'll cook up a new version if the of_pinctrl_utils_node_is_mux/config()
> is okay with you.

I'm following your idea and I agree. Let's see how that
looks.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to