On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:32:00PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > This patch adds skb_copy_datagram_iter, which is identical to
> > skb_copy_datagram_iovec except that it operates on iov_iter
> > instead of iovec.
> > 
> > Eventually all users of skb_copy_datagram_iovec should switch
> > over to iov_iter and then we can remove skb_copy_datagram_iovec.
> 
> Too noisy, IMO.  How about skb_copy_datagram_msg() first?  The fewer
> places have to even think of iovec or iov_iter, the better...

PS: "too noisy" is about turning every callsite of skb_copy_datagram_iovec
into that of skb_copy_datagram_iter; the helper itself is just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to