On Monday 10 November 2014 04:09 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > On 11/07/2014 02:05 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > <snip> >> If the merge turns out to be simple, then Git will do the correct >> thing; however, if the first version of the patch is applied, then >> some changes around the same area of the file occur _then_ when the >> second version (of the same patch differing only by SHA1) is applied >> Git will get confused. If it has the same SHA1 however, Git will >> discard it as 'already applied'. This is the reason we pass around >> shared tags to immutable branches. > Looking at how the patch is trivial, I persist to think there is no issue. > But OK, I will prepare an immutable branch.. > > Kishon, checkpatch complains because this new file has no maintainer. > Is it ok for you if I add it to the Generic PHY subsystem?
yeah.. sure. Thanks Kishon > > Regards, > Maxime > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
