Recently lockless_dereference() was added which can be used in place of
hard-coding smp_read_barrier_depends(). The following PATCH makes the change.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index ed4f593..386ba28 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -582,11 +582,11 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
})
#define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
({ \
- typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p) *__force)ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
+ /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
+ typeof(*p) *________p1 = (typeof(*p) *__force)lockless_dereference(p); \
rcu_lockdep_assert(c, "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
- smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
+ ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(________p1)); \
})
#define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
({ \
@@ -603,10 +603,10 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
})
#define __rcu_dereference_index_check(p, c) \
({ \
- typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
+ /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
+ typeof(p) _________p1 = lockless_dereference(p); \
rcu_lockdep_assert(c, \
"suspicious rcu_dereference_index_check() usage"); \
- smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
(_________p1); \
})
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
