On 14/11/14 04:53, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Using BUG() instead would make the code less complex. Do you really > think xen_update_mem_tables() would ever fail in a sane system? > > - set_phys_to_machine() would fail only on a memory shortage. Just > going on without adding more memory wouldn't lead to a healthy system, > I think. > - The hypervisor calls would fail only in case of parameter errors. > This should never happen, so dying seems to be the correct reaction. > > David, what do you think?
BUG() sounds fine. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
