On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 10:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Joe Perches wrote: [] > > Yes, I agree with some of the things Al Viro said > > there, but isn't 'type t; t *p;' a subset of > > "expression *e"?
> No. How would you expect it to be different. [] > type t means that the type > is known. expression *e means that there is a * in the type. I had thought "expression *" could be r-value and "type t; t *p;" could be l-value. But then I don't find (or maybe don't parse too well) the coccinelle documentation that specifies these type relationships. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
