On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 16:35 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:22:56 -0800
> 
> > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 22:08 +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <f...@skynet.be>
> >> ---
> >>  net/core/link_watch.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/net/core/link_watch.c b/net/core/link_watch.c
> >> index bd0767e..49a9e3e 100644
> >> --- a/net/core/link_watch.c
> >> +++ b/net/core/link_watch.c
> >> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> >> -#include <asm/types.h>
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>  
> > 
> > We have 99 such occurrences in net/
> > 
> > Are you going to send 99 patches ?
> 
> Yeah, probably best to consolidate into one or a few patches.

BTW the 99 occurrences are for asm/uaccess.h, it seems I gave the reply
on the wrong patch.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to