On Nov 20, 2014 2:28 AM, "Borislav Petkov" <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:46:29PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > So we'd do, in do_machine_check: > > > > irq_enter(); > > > > do atomic stuff; > > > > ist_stop_being_atomic(regs); > > local_irq_enable(); > > ... > > local_irq_disable(); > > ist_start_being_atomic_again(); > > Well, why would I want to go atomic again? We just do the minimally > needed atomic stuff, irq_exit() and then do the rest.
Because ist_exit will get confused otherwise, and you still need to call something on the way out for context tracking. Yes, I could rearrange it a bit. Will ponder. --Andy > > > > > irq_exit(); > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
