(2014/11/22 4:43), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:05:29 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:16 -0500
>> Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> + * IPMODIFY - The ops can modify the IP register. This can only be set with
>>> + * SAVE_REGS. If another ops is already registered for any of
>>> the
>>> + * functions that this ops will be registered for, then this ops
>>> + * will fail to register or set_filter_ip.
>>
>> It's blocked by any ops sharing the same function, or just another ops
>> with this flag set? The comment doesn't specify. The code looks like
>> the latter.
>
> I applied it and gave it the following updates to comments:
Thanks!
This looks good to me :)
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 93cf0478f64e..ed501953f0b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -107,9 +107,9 @@ ftrace_func_t ftrace_ops_get_func(struct ftrace_ops *ops);
> * in such cases the arch must not modify it. Only the arch ftrace
> * core code should set this flag.
> * IPMODIFY - The ops can modify the IP register. This can only be set with
> - * SAVE_REGS. If another ops is already registered for any of the
> - * functions that this ops will be registered for, then this ops
> - * will fail to register or set_filter_ip.
> + * SAVE_REGS. If another ops with this flag set is already
> registered
> + * for any of the functions that this ops will be registered for,
> then
> + * this ops will fail to register or set_filter_ip.
> */
> enum {
> FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED = 1 << 0,
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 531e72a716c3..929a733d302e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -1810,8 +1810,8 @@ static int __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(struct
> ftrace_ops *ops,
> return 0;
>
> /*
> - * Since the IPMODIFY is very address sensitive action, we do not allow
> - * ftrace_ops to set all functions to new hash.
> + * Since the IPMODIFY is a very address sensitive action, we do not
> + * allow ftrace_ops to set all functions to new hash.
> */
> if (!new_hash || !old_hash)
> return -EINVAL;
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: [email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
