On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:00:54PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/11/26 2:15), Seth Jennings wrote:
> > Note to Steve:
> > Masami's IPMODIFY patch is heading for -next via your tree.  Once it 
> > arrives,
> > I'll rebase and make the change to set IPMODIFY.  Do not pull this for -next
> > yet.  This version (v4) is for review and gathering acks.
> 
> BTW, as we discussed IPMODIFY is an exclusive flag. So if we allocate 
> ftrace_ops
> for each function in each patch, it could be conflict each other.
> Maybe we need to have another ops hashtable to find such conflict and new
> handler to handle it.

I agree, but this is not a problem with the current patch set because it
doesn't yet support patching the same function multiple times :-)

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to