On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:00:54PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/11/26 2:15), Seth Jennings wrote: > > Note to Steve: > > Masami's IPMODIFY patch is heading for -next via your tree. Once it > > arrives, > > I'll rebase and make the change to set IPMODIFY. Do not pull this for -next > > yet. This version (v4) is for review and gathering acks. > > BTW, as we discussed IPMODIFY is an exclusive flag. So if we allocate > ftrace_ops > for each function in each patch, it could be conflict each other. > Maybe we need to have another ops hashtable to find such conflict and new > handler to handle it.
I agree, but this is not a problem with the current patch set because it doesn't yet support patching the same function multiple times :-) -- Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
