On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:28:31PM -0200, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:14:31 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > If it would help to have !CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y,
> > please let me know and I will create a patch that forces this.
> > (Not mainline material, but if it helps with debug...)
>
> Hi Paul. Please, I'd like the patch, because without
> preemption, I'm unable to trigger this bug.
Well, this turned out to be way simpler than I expected. Passes
light rcutorture testing. Sometimes you get lucky...
Thanx, Paul
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 903505e66d1d..2cf71fcd514f 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ choice
config TREE_RCU
bool "Tree-based hierarchical RCU"
- depends on !PREEMPT && SMP
+ depends on SMP
select IRQ_WORK
help
This option selects the RCU implementation that is
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
