On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:58:38PM -0200, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:40:37 +0800
> Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > It is needed at lest for testing.
> >
> > CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n is needed for testing too.
> >
> > Please enable them (or enable them under CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y)
>
> Lai, sorry but I didn't understand. Do you mean both of them
> enabled? Because how can CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU be enabled without
> CONFIG_PREEMPT ?
Hmmm... I did misread that in my reply. A similar Kconfig edit will
enable that, but I am even less happy about the thought of pushing that
to mainline! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> If you mean both enabled, I already reported a call trace with
> both enabled:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
>
> Please see my previous answer to Linus and Paul too.
>
> Regarding CONFIG_RCU_TRACE, do you mean
> "CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE"? I couldn't find CONFIG_RCU_TRACE.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Linux 3.17.0-dirty: Shuffling Zombie Juror
> http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
> http://exchangewar.info
> Bitcoin: 12H6661yoLDUZaYPdah6urZS5WiXwTAUgL
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
