On 12/02/2014 09:20 AM, Christopher Covington wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and >> let the chips fall where they may. >> >> Add support for CROSS_COMPILE while we're at it. Also we don't need a >> custom rule for building kcmp_test. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > > For what it's worth, all three patches look good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Christopher Covington <c...@codeaurora.org> > > Thanks, > Chris >
All three patches queued for 3.19 - linux-kselftest.git/ fixes branch kcmp fails on couple tests it runs when CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE is disabled. However, it isn't bad enough to not include the patch, especially when there is use for it on arm. FAIL: 0 expected but -1 returned (Function not implemented) FAIL: 0 expected but -1 returned (Function not implemented) -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
