On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:26:42PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 07:57:02PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:42:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > Split the device_control callback of the TI OMAP DMA driver to make use > > > > of the newly introduced callbacks, that will eventually be used to > > > > retrieve > > > > slave capabilities. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/omap-dma.c | 51 > > > > +++++++++++++++----------------------------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > > > > index a8aa5b6bb5e2..1cadf812f3b3 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > > > > @@ -948,8 +948,10 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor > > > > *omap_dma_prep_dma_cyclic( > > > > return vchan_tx_prep(&c->vc, &d->vd, flags); > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int omap_dma_slave_config(struct omap_chan *c, struct > > > > dma_slave_config *cfg) > > > > +static int omap_dma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan, struct > > > > dma_slave_config *cfg) > > > > { > > > > + struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan); > > > > + > > > > if (cfg->src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES || > > > > cfg->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > @@ -959,8 +961,9 @@ static int omap_dma_slave_config(struct omap_chan > > > > *c, struct dma_slave_config *c > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int omap_dma_terminate_all(struct omap_chan *c) > > > > +static int omap_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan) > > > > { > > > > + struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan); > > > > struct omap_dmadev *d = to_omap_dma_dev(c->vc.chan.device); > > > > unsigned long flags; > > > > LIST_HEAD(head); > > > > @@ -996,8 +999,10 @@ static int omap_dma_terminate_all(struct omap_chan > > > > *c) > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int omap_dma_pause(struct omap_chan *c) > > > > +static int omap_dma_pause(struct dma_chan *chan) > > > > { > > > > + struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan); > > > > + > > > > /* Pause/Resume only allowed with cyclic mode */ > > > > if (!c->cyclic) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > @@ -1010,8 +1015,10 @@ static int omap_dma_pause(struct omap_chan *c) > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int omap_dma_resume(struct omap_chan *c) > > > > +static int omap_dma_resume(struct dma_chan *chan) > > > > { > > > > + struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan); > > > > + > > > > /* Pause/Resume only allowed with cyclic mode */ > > > > if (!c->cyclic) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > @@ -1029,37 +1036,6 @@ static int omap_dma_resume(struct omap_chan *c) > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static int omap_dma_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd > > > > cmd, > > > > - unsigned long arg) > > > > -{ > > > > - struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan); > > > > - int ret; > > > > - > > > > - switch (cmd) { > > > > - case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG: > > > > - ret = omap_dma_slave_config(c, (struct dma_slave_config > > > > *)arg); > > > > - break; > > > > - > > > > - case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL: > > > > - ret = omap_dma_terminate_all(c); > > > > - break; > > > > - > > > > - case DMA_PAUSE: > > > > - ret = omap_dma_pause(c); > > > > - break; > > > > - > > > > - case DMA_RESUME: > > > > - ret = omap_dma_resume(c); > > > > - break; > > > > - > > > > - default: > > > > - ret = -ENXIO; > > > > - break; > > > > - } > > > > - > > > > - return ret; > > > > -} > > > > - > > > > static int omap_dma_chan_init(struct omap_dmadev *od, int dma_sig) > > > > { > > > > struct omap_chan *c; > > > > @@ -1136,7 +1112,10 @@ static int omap_dma_probe(struct platform_device > > > > *pdev) > > > > od->ddev.device_issue_pending = omap_dma_issue_pending; > > > > od->ddev.device_prep_slave_sg = omap_dma_prep_slave_sg; > > > > od->ddev.device_prep_dma_cyclic = omap_dma_prep_dma_cyclic; > > > > - od->ddev.device_control = omap_dma_control; > > > this should be assigned to omap_dma_slave_config. omap_dma_control is not > > > here :( > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here. I'm removing this line, together with > > the whole omap_dma_control function. > Sorry wrong quote and not good explanations. the lines i quoted is > wrong one... > > - od->ddev.device_control = omap_dma_control; > + od->ddev.device_config = omap_dma_config; > this is troubling line here... > > we dont have omap_dma_config. It should be omap_dma_slave_config instead
Ah, right. I have no idea why it haven't been picked up by intel's build bot thuough. Anyway. Do you want me to send a new version of these patches for this trivial fix and the mxs one, or do you want me to send a follow-up? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature