On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:39:14PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
> 
> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/usb_intf.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/usb_intf.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> index 865743e..71a6330 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> @@ -351,10 +351,11 @@ error_exit:
>  int rtw_hw_resume23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter)

That's weird.  Is this function even called?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to