> If ARM and SUPERH imply HAS_DMA, that formula is almost identical to
> the one I proposed in my patch?

Ehrm, true :)

>        depends on HAS_DMA
>        depends on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> I just prefer to split dependencies in two lines where it makes sense ("hard"
> dependencies vs. "soft" (user platform configuration) dependencies).

I prefer my version slightly. But not worth the hazzle, I'll pick yours.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to