On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 07:53 -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 23:35 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> The rule which delivers this warning is very prone to errors:
> >> "added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?"
> >> so it should not be enabled by default.
> >
> > I don't think so.
> >
> > It's _far_ more common for people to forget to
> > update MAINTAINERS so I think it's quite useful
> > even if it's slightly noisy.
>
> In a recent submission I saw a bunch of these warnings too, even
> though I had already added MAINTAINERS entries.
>
> If this is just a friendly reminder ("hey, please double-check X
> before you send") rather than an indication that a suspected problem
> was detected in the patch, perhaps it would be better if it lived in
> Documentation/SubmitChecklist?
An entry might help.
Submit a patch to SubmitChecklist and see if the
overall MAINTAINERS patterns error rate changes
over a few release cycles.
Another thing that might help you not see these
by creating a .checkpatch.conf file and adding:
"--ignore=FILE_PATH_CHANGES"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
