On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:45:56PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/24/14 12:15 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >Otherwise it'll break the machine->threads tree.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> >---
> >  tools/perf/util/machine.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> >index 031bace39fdc..beae6e8fe789 100644
> >--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> >+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> >@@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ static struct thread *__machine__findnew_thread(struct 
> >machine *machine,
> >              * leader and that would screwed the rb tree.
> >              */
> >             if (thread__init_map_groups(th, machine)) {
> >+                    rb_erase(&th->rb_node, &machine->threads);
> >                     thread__delete(th);
> >                     return NULL;
> >             }
> >
> 
> Can you move the thread__init_map_groups() before the thread is added to the
> rbtree? If no, you need to delay setting 'machine->last_match = th'
> otherwise it references a deleted thread.

You're right - I'll move the setting after the thread__init_map_groups().

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to