On 01/05/15 11:49, Kalle Valo wrote:
Rickard Strandqvist<rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se> writes:
As I hope you can see I have made some changes regarding the
subject-line. Thought it was an advantage to be able to see which file
I actually removed something from. There seems to be a big focus on
getting right on subject-line right in recent weeks.
I wonder why there is a script that takes a file name, and respond
with an appropriate subject line?
Is there a script for this? Anyway, I would say driver name is enough.
Enough about the subject line ;-) I would like to give some general
remarks as you seem to touch a lot of kernel code. First off, I think it
is good to remove unused stuff. However, I would like some more
explanation on your methodology apart from "partially found by using a
static code analysis program". So a cover-letter explaining that would
have been nice (maybe still is). Things like Kconfig option can affect
whether function are used or not so how did you cover that.
Regards,
Arend
I don't think you can really automate this as some drivers do this a bit
differently. You always need to manually check the commit log.
But ok, I change my script accordingly. Should I submit the patch again?
Yes, please resubmit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
