Mark it so by renaming __mutex_lock_check_stamp().

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 4541951..b042ea5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ void __sched ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_unlock);
 
 static inline int __sched
-__mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+__ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
 {
        struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
        struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = ACCESS_ONCE(ww->ctx);
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, 
unsigned int subclass,
                }
 
                if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
-                       ret = __mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
+                       ret = __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
                        if (ret)
                                goto err;
                }
-- 
2.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to