On 01/06/2015 03:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:57:42 -0800 Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>> Hi Jason >>> >>> I'm trying to figure out what to do with my long-outstanding kgdb/kdb >>> patches in preparation for the 3.20 merge window. >>> >>> As of now I have five pending patch sets some of which are well over six >>> months old (and none have nay outstanding review comments). >>> >>> When I raised this with you a couple of months ago, two of the patch >>> sets did land in your kgdb-next tree. However nothing seems to have >>> happened since then and I couldn't find any messages from you during the >>> 3.19 merge window. >>> >>> I'm afraid I don't know what else I need to do to progress things. >>> >>> I do plan to do routine rebasing and resending of my patchsets but, >>> based on the past experience, that seems unlikely to be enough to get >>> the code delivered in 3.20. >>> >>> Do you think I would be better sending these patches via someone else? >>> In any case, advice would be very welcome. >> Andrew? >> >> I think Daniel's kgdb patches are bug fixes. >> >> Can you please pick them up? > yup. Merging patches which are already in -next is a bit of a pain, > but I'll cope. > > Daniel, can you please resend everything in a nice clean coherent > stream? >
I did not mean to miss the merge window, but I ended up being out the majority of December -> yesterday. Now that I am back, I don't think you have to burden Andrew here. I'll send a pull request for what is in kgdb-next since it is cleanups and fixes, and regression test anything else Daniel has left. Cheers, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/