On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:12:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:43:47PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > @@ -750,6 +750,17 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> > */
> > PERF_RECORD_AUX = 11,
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Indicates that instruction trace has started
> > + *
> > + * struct {
> > + * struct perf_event_header header;
> > + * u32 pid;
> > + * u32 tid;
>
> The below function suggests we should have:
>
> struct sample_id sample_id;
>
> > + * };
> > + */
> > + PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START = 12,
This also raises the question; why not use PERF_RECORD_COMM?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
