On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:10:40PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Jan 2015 [19:27:35], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Some devices might not implement config space access
> > (e.g. remoteproc used not to - before 3.9).
> > virtio/console needs config space access so make it
> > fail gracefully if not there.
> 
> Do we know any such devices?  Wondering what prompted this patch.  If
> it's just theoretical, I'd rather let it be like this, and pull this
> in when there's a device that doesn't have config space.

Yes, with virtio 1.0 config space can be in a separate BAR now.  If
that's not enabled by BIOS (e.g. out of space), we won't have config
space.

> Also, just the console functionality (i.e. F_MULTIPORT is unset) is
> available w/o config space access.

Supporting this by gracefully disabling F_MULTIPORT
would require getting this info from driver before
features are finalized.
Alternatively, check F_MULTIPORT and only fail if set?
Let me know, I'll cook up a patch.

> In fact, getting this patch in
> would mean remoteproc wouldn't even run in its pre-config days...

It seems to have get callback unconditionally now - or did I miss
something?


> > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > index de03df9..26afb56 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > @@ -1986,6 +1986,12 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >     bool multiport;
> >     bool early = early_put_chars != NULL;
> >  
> > +   if (!vdev->config->get) {
> > +           dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
> > +                   __func__);
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
> > +
> 
> 
>               Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to