On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:40:56PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 12:40 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >The current code uses setup_irq, while it could perfectly use the much
> >simpler
> >request_irq. Switch to that.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> >---
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c | 10 ++--------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
> >b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
> >index 02268448dc85..738853873a3b 100644
> >--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
> >+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
> >@@ -130,13 +130,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sun5i_timer_interrupt(int irq, void
> >*dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> >-static struct irqaction sun5i_timer_irq = {
> >- .name = "sun5i_timer0",
> >- .flags = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
> >- .handler = sun5i_timer_interrupt,
> >- .dev_id = &sun5i_clockevent,
> >-};
> >-
> > static u64 sun5i_timer_sched_read(void)
> > {
> > return ~readl(timer_base + TIMER_CNTVAL_LO_REG(1));
> >@@ -178,7 +171,8 @@ static void __init sun5i_timer_init(struct device_node
> >*node)
> >
> > ticks_per_jiffy = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, HZ);
> >
> >- ret = setup_irq(irq, &sun5i_timer_irq);
> >+ ret = request_irq(irq, sun5i_timer_interrupt, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
> >+ "sun5i_timer", &sun5i_clockevent);
>
> Is the timer name change done in purpose ?Hmm, no, it's a mistake. I'll resend a v2. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
