On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:15:52 -0500 Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:20:15AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > The hardlockup and softockup had always been tied together. Due to the > > request > > of KVM folks, they had a need to have one enabled but not the other. > > Internally rework the code to split things apart more cleanly. > > > > There is a bunch of churn here, but the end result should be code that > > should > > be easier to maintain and fix without knowing the internals of what is going > > on. > > > > Tested by Uli and myself. > > Hi Andrew, > > Poking again. What can I do to move this along? Should I repost? I don't actually remember seeing this, but November was soooo long ago ;) Yes please - refresh, retest, resend. Don't forget to gather up any new acked/reviewed/tested-by's. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
