Looks like the "test_maps" test case expects to get the keys in
the wrong order when iterating over the elements:

test_maps: samples/bpf/test_maps.c:79: test_hashmap_sanity: Assertion
`bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 && next_key == 2' failed.
Aborted

Fix this and test for the correct order.  

Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holz...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 samples/bpf/test_maps.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/samples/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ static void test_hashmap_sanity(int i, v
 
        /* iterate over two elements */
        assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 &&
-              next_key == 2);
-       assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 &&
               next_key == 1);
+       assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 &&
+              next_key == 2);
        assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == -1 &&
               errno == ENOENT);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to