The need for the smp_mb in __rwsem_do_wake should be
properly documented. Applies to both xadd and spinlock
variants.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 5 +++++
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c     | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 2555ae1..54f7a17 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
 
                list_del(&waiter->list);
                tsk = waiter->task;
+               /*
+                * Ensure that all cores see the read before
+                * setting it to the waiter task to nil, as that
+                * grants the read lock to the next task.
+                */
                smp_mb();
                waiter->task = NULL;
                wake_up_process(tsk);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 2f7cc40..149e8c7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum 
rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
                waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
                next = waiter->list.next;
                tsk = waiter->task;
+               /*
+                * Ensure that all cores see the read before
+                * setting it to the waiter task to nil, as that
+                * grants the read lock to the next task.
+                */
                smp_mb();
                waiter->task = NULL;
                wake_up_process(tsk);
-- 
2.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to