Am 27.01.2015 um 13:15 schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 27.01.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Borislav Petkov: >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:02:49PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: >>> Look at the source at the message which is printed just before and decide >>> which one you find more informational / useful. >> >> I find such a message absolutely useless. Also, if it flies off and >> printk buffer gets overwritten, it serves you sh*t. IOW, listen to what >> Richard tells you. > > Ok. I shut/give up.
There is no need to be sulky. > Maybe you could be so nice to inform me where the similiar detail is exposed > in sysfs for SSDs. If it is not already exposed and you can come up with a sane use case send a patch. > Also it's unlikely I will send any further patch. There are still 21 from me > where I've exposed sysfs attributes for NAND devices which are still not > applied and most NAND devices > still don't have a sysfs entry. > > So why should I waste my time again? If you give up after the first review round there is nothing I can do for you. Postings like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/162 are also not really beneficial to get a patch merged. Thanks, //richard P.s. If you see every not-merged patch as a waste of time, please stop developing software as it is obviously not an enjoyment for you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
