Am 27.01.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
Also it's unlikely I will send any further patch. There are still 21 from me
where I've exposed sysfs attributes for NAND devices which are still not
applied and most NAND devices
still don't have a sysfs entry.
So why should I waste my time again?
If you give up after the first review round there is nothing I can do for you.
Postings like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/162 are also not really beneficial
to get a patch merged.
Yes. Sorry, but I had so many bad experiences with maintainers. They
told me that using functions means hiding stuff, that I should bisect
even when I was absolutely sure which patch was wrong (and everxyone
could see it by just reading the source and by reading my comments, I've
got blamed because I prefer a controlled BUG_ON() (which might even just
kill the involved tasks, depending on config settings) instead of a
desastrous memory corruption which (hard-) reseted the machine (and
might have done even more bad things) and so on.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
