On 01/28/2015 02:45 PM, Stewart Smith wrote: > Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> The device tree now exposes the residency values for different idle states. >> Read >> these values instead of calculating residency from the latency values. The >> values >> exposed in the DT are validated for optimal power efficiency. However to >> maintain >> compatibility with the older firmware code which does not expose residency >> values, use default values as a fallback mechanism. While at it, handle some >> cleanups. > > From a "I just merged the patch that exports these values from firmware" > point of view, using them and falling back looks good. > > (I find the hardcoding of snooze in the driver a bit odd, as is the
Snooze is the only software defined idle state, the rest are platform specific. The first idle state is usually associated with some sort of a polling operation and each architecture has a variant to this. This is why we end up hard-coding this idle state in the driver as far as my understanding goes. > hardcoding of max power states to 8 - which could bite us in the future Hmm.. not sure about this. Need to check. > if a future processor has more states... but these aren't problems with > this patch) > > Acked-by: Stewart Smith <stew...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks! Regards Preeti U Murthy > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
