Bryan, Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across both Galileo Gen v1 & v2.
Cheers, BL >-----Original Message----- >From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:12 PM >To: Andy Shevchenko; Ingo Molnar >Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; [email protected]; >[email protected]; Ong, Boon Leong; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 > >On 29/01/15 10:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> * Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [] >> >>> In any case, I don't see any major problems with this code, so if >>> it's fixed it could go into v3.20. >> >> Brian, it would be really nice to have it in 3.20 since we have >> several drivers already in upstream or be ready for 3.20. >> It would be then first upstream kernel with minimal Quark support. > >NP lads - I'll get a patch out today -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
