Bryan,

Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across 
both Galileo Gen v1 & v2. 

Cheers,
BL  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie]
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:12 PM
>To: Andy Shevchenko; Ingo Molnar
>Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; x...@kernel.org;
>dvh...@infradead.org; Ong, Boon Leong; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
>
>On 29/01/15 10:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> * Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> wrote:
>>
>> []
>>
>>> In any case, I don't see any major problems with this code, so if
>>> it's fixed it could go into v3.20.
>>
>> Brian, it would be really nice to have it in 3.20 since we have
>> several drivers already in upstream or be ready for 3.20.
>> It would be then first upstream kernel with minimal Quark support.
>
>NP lads - I'll get a patch out today

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to