On 29/01/15 15:32, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:22 PM
To: Ong, Boon Leong
Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Andy Shevchenko; Ingo
Molnar
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
On 29/01/15 13:47, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
Bryan,
Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across
both Galileo Gen v1 & v2.
Cheers,
BL
Andy/BL - thanks for taking the time to test.
I may end up dropping the imr_del_range() tests based on index as a result of
changing the external interface as suggested by Ingo.
It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address based.
Understood. The direction from Ingo was to have address based external
interface imr_del_range() and support an index based internal
imr_clear() - internally.
So - in order to get test coverage - I'll move the self-test code back
into the main IMR code
Not as pretty that way - but better coverage :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
