On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:59:58AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Thank you for your review. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:43:16AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > > @@ -272,6 +268,9 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void) > > > sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base); > > > slow_clock = __arm_ioremap_exec(sram_pbase, at91_slow_clock_sz, > > > false); > > > > > > + /* Copy the slow_clock handler to SRAM */ > > > + memcpy(slow_clock, at91_slow_clock, at91_slow_clock_sz); > > > + > > > > Why is this code not using the fncpy() support for copying functions. > At first, used the fncpy(), but it work not well on the some chip. I > will check it again.
Please report on this; why does it "work not well" ? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
