Hi Roger,

On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Felipe & Chanwoo,
>>
>> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not
>>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name.
>>>
>>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
>>
>> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as 
>> possible.
>>
>> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree?
>> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks.
>>
>> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as 
>> Tony
>> will pick the rest.
> 
> Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with
> "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST".

Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or USB-HOST)
without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in extcon
header file by using capital letter.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to