On Monday 02 February 2015 08:01 PM, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> The qcom ufs phy support is split into three separate loadable
>> modules, however none of the interfaces are exported, resulting
>> in a link error:
>>
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_power_off" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_power_on" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_exit" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators"
>> [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_remove" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "get_ufs_qcom_phy" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_power_off" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_power_on" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_exit" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators"
>> [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "ufs_qcom_phy_remove" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: "get_ufs_qcom_phy" [drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.ko]
>> undefined!
>>
>> This exports all of the symbols that are provided by the base library
>> module and used by the two driver modules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>> Fixes: adaafaa393ef ("phy: qcom-ufs: add support for QUALCOMM Technologies
>> UFS PHY drivers")
>> ---
>>
>> The broken patch is currently in the scsi tree, so if the phy maintainer
>> thinks that my fix is correct, it should go there too.
>
> I believe that exporting all interface functions is a good solution.
>
>>
>> An alternative approach would be to link all three phy-qcom-ufs source
>> files into a single module.
where is this driver merged? it's not in linux-phy.
-Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
