On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Lad Prabhakar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email protected]>
>
> this patch fixes following sparse warnings:
> sysrq.c:58:16: warning: symbol 'platform_sysrq_reset_seq' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> sysrq.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'sysrq_reset_downtime_ms' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
>
Sorry for the nose please drop this patch, it causes build failure,
drivers/tty/sysrq.c:58:23: error: weak declaration of
‘platform_sysrq_reset_seq’ must be public
static unsigned short platform_sysrq_reset_seq[] __weak = { KEY_RESERVED };
^
drivers/tty/sysrq.c:59:12: error: weak declaration of
‘sysrq_reset_downtime_ms’ must be public
static int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms __weak;
^
Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]>
> ---
> Found this issue on linux-next (gcc version 4.8.2,
> sparse version 0.4.5-rc1)and applies on top linux-next.
>
> drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> index 259a4d5..d272a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
> static int __read_mostly sysrq_enabled = CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ_DEFAULT_ENABLE;
> static bool __read_mostly sysrq_always_enabled;
>
> -unsigned short platform_sysrq_reset_seq[] __weak = { KEY_RESERVED };
> -int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms __weak;
> +static unsigned short platform_sysrq_reset_seq[] __weak = { KEY_RESERVED };
> +static int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms __weak;
>
> static bool sysrq_on(void)
> {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
