From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:53:11 +0100

The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
index 38ec8d1..c410180 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ void free_orinocodev(struct orinoco_private *priv)
        list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, sdtemp, &priv->scan_list, list) {
                list_del(&sd->list);
 
-               if ((sd->len > 0) && sd->buf)
+               if (sd->len > 0)
                        kfree(sd->buf);
                kfree(sd);
        }
-- 
2.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to