On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:49:30PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Brian Norris wrote: > > Typically "simpler" and "reducing the cost of having lots of extra DT > > properties" aren't good enough reasons for immediately breaking an > > existing DT binding. We usually expect to support both for some period > > of time. > > Only once a binding has became ABI. As there are no users of this > driver yet (this will change after this sync'ing patch-set has been > applied), so we can safely consider this binding to be in-progress and > as such, not yet ABI, thus we can do this ol' switch-aroo without the > usual 6 month deprecation period.
OK, fine with me. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
