On 02/09/2015 04:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:05:57PM +0000, Jason Baron wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
>> index 852143a..17d1039 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
>> @@ -71,8 +71,11 @@ static void __wake_up_common(wait_queue_head_t *q, 
>> unsigned int mode,
>>              unsigned flags = curr->flags;
>>  
>>              if (curr->func(curr, mode, wake_flags, key) &&
>> -                            (flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !--nr_exclusive)
>> +                           (flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !--nr_exclusive) {
>> +                    if (flags & WQ_FLAG_ROUND_ROBIN)
>> +                            list_move_tail(&curr->task_list, &q->task_list);
>>                      break;
>> +            }
>>      }
>>  }
> I think you meant to write something like:
>
>       if (curr->func(curr, mode, wake_flags, key) &&
>           (flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE)) {
>               if (flag & WQ_FLAG_ROUND_ROBIN)
>                       list_move_tail(&curr->task_list, &q->task_list);
>               if (!--nr_exclusive)
>                       break;
>       }
>
> Otherwise can only work for nr_exclusive==1.

Indeed. I'm also wondering if its worth avoiding the list_move_tail() for the 
case where nr_exclusive is initially 0. IE the wake all case, where we are just 
going to end up doing a bunch of list_move_tail() calls, but end up in the same 
state.

Thanks,

-Jason



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to