On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:40:39AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > + /* Check for readable registers before we start */ > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) > + if (!regmap_readable(map, reg + (i * map->reg_stride))) > + return -EINVAL;
That's starting to look pretty expensive especially if what we're looking for is just max_register really... This is one of the reasons we're not religious about checking for readability everywhere, and obviously even if we avoid triggering this particular thing we still have to cope with both the caller and devices that didn't specify readability. A cheaper check for just max_register would be less concerning but it feels like we're trying to paper over a symptom with this rather than fix a problem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature