On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:49:40PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Also, it still not clear why patch 10 uses relative capacity reduction > instead of absolute capacity available to CFS tasks.
As present in your asymmetric big and small systems? Yes it would be unfortunate to migrate a task to an idle small core when the big core is still faster, even if reduced by rt/irq work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
