On 02/19/2015 12:00 PM, Jiri Bohac wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to understand what exactly is going on here... > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:58:19AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> The test did the following in userspace: >> >> tx.modes = ADJ_STATUS; >> tx.status = STA_INS; >> >> /* send leap second request */ >> ret = adjtimex(&tx); >> >> /* Check adjtimex output every half second */ >> now = tx.time.tv_sec; >> while (now < next_leap+2) { >> char buf[26]; >> ret = adjtimex(&tx); >> >> ctime_r(&tx.time.tv_sec, buf); >> buf[strlen(buf)-1] = 0; /*remove trailing\n */ >> >> printf("%s + %6ld us\t%s\n", >> buf, >> tx.time.tv_usec, >> time_state_str(ret)); >> now = tx.time.tv_sec; >> /* Sleep for another half second */ >> ts.tv_sec = 0; >> ts.tv_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC/2; >> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, 0, &ts, NULL); >> } >> >> After some investigation it was noted that the test contained a small error: >> the test does not reinitialize tx.status and reissues the STA_INS every >> 1/2 second. > > Prarit, can you explain who sets the STA_PLL flag, so that > process_adj_status() detects a STA_PLL->!STA_PLL transition and > goes to the branch that sets time_state = TIME_OK?
Jiri, The test being run is: https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests/blob/master/leap-a-day.c prior to commit https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests/commit/be4526e8b5d48cd108a8d2cf7f5c8fd763acf421 > > Is that ntpd running in parallel with your test program? If that No -- ntpd is disabled (chronyd in the case of systemd + current Fedora). P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/