Fix inconsistency in the semantics of the scale attribute.
For scale the write_raw function was considering the scale table index
and writing the appropriate value into the range register, while
for read_raw it was outputting the actual scale.
Fix this behaviour and adhere to the iio ABI specification.

Signed-off-by: Adriana Reus <adriana.r...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c 
b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
index 9be9b20..4cf056d 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
@@ -401,42 +401,46 @@ error_read_raw:
        }
 }
 
-static int inv_mpu6050_write_fsr(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int fsr)
+static int inv_mpu6050_write_gyro_scale(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int val)
 {
-       int result;
+       int result, i;
        u8 d;
 
-       if (fsr < 0 || fsr > INV_MPU6050_MAX_GYRO_FS_PARAM)
-               return -EINVAL;
-       if (fsr == st->chip_config.fsr)
-               return 0;
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gyro_scale_6050); ++i) {
+               if (gyro_scale_6050[i] == val) {
+                       d = (i << INV_MPU6050_GYRO_CONFIG_FSR_SHIFT);
+                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st,
+                                       st->reg->gyro_config, d);
+                       if (result)
+                               return result;
 
-       d = (fsr << INV_MPU6050_GYRO_CONFIG_FSR_SHIFT);
-       result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->gyro_config, d);
-       if (result)
-               return result;
-       st->chip_config.fsr = fsr;
+                       st->chip_config.fsr = i;
+                       return 0;
+               }
+       }
 
-       return 0;
+       return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int inv_mpu6050_write_accel_fs(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int fs)
+static int inv_mpu6050_write_accel_scale(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int val)
 {
-       int result;
+       int result, i;
        u8 d;
 
-       if (fs < 0 || fs > INV_MPU6050_MAX_ACCL_FS_PARAM)
-               return -EINVAL;
-       if (fs == st->chip_config.accl_fs)
-               return 0;
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(accel_scale); ++i) {
+               if (accel_scale[i] == val) {
+                       d = (i << INV_MPU6050_ACCL_CONFIG_FSR_SHIFT);
+                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st,
+                                       st->reg->accl_config, d);
+                       if (result)
+                               return result;
 
-       d = (fs << INV_MPU6050_ACCL_CONFIG_FSR_SHIFT);
-       result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->accl_config, d);
-       if (result)
-               return result;
-       st->chip_config.accl_fs = fs;
+                       st->chip_config.accl_fs = i;
+                       return 0;
+               }
+       }
 
-       return 0;
+       return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
@@ -463,10 +467,10 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw(struct iio_dev 
*indio_dev,
        case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
                switch (chan->type) {
                case IIO_ANGL_VEL:
-                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_fsr(st, val);
+                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_gyro_scale(st, val2);
                        break;
                case IIO_ACCEL:
-                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_accel_fs(st, val);
+                       result = inv_mpu6050_write_accel_scale(st, val2);
                        break;
                default:
                        result = -EINVAL;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to