Hi Michal,
I have a few minor comments below, but generally this is looking like
one of the best dts submissions I've seen!
[...]
> +/ {
> + model = "ZynqMP EP108";
> +
> + aliases {
> + serial0 = &uart0;
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> + };
Thanks for using stdout-path with the full parameters.
Does your UART have earlycon support?
[...]
> +/ {
> + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
I guess this is fine, though to me it feels more natural to use
#size-cells = <2> in case we need to describe larger ranges for some bus
later.
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@1 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x1>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@2 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@3 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + reg = <0x3>;
> + };
> + };
These look fine.
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> + method = "smc";
> + };
Neat!
What are you using as your implementation? Are all the mandatory
PSCIv0.2 features implemented (e.g. MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE)?
I take it this boots at EL2 on all CPUs?
Does CPU0 hotplug work?
Do you need to keep a CPU online or do you require MIGRATE? e.g. does
MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE return something other than 2 ("MP or not present")?
[...]
> + amba_apu {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
> + <1 14 0xff01>,
> + <1 11 0xff01>,
> + <1 10 0xff01>;
> + };
The architected timer should just be under the root node, given it's a
component of the CPU -- it doesn't live on any bus.
I take it CNTFRQ is configured appropriately on all CPUs?
[...]
> + i2c_clk: i2c_clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0x0>;
> + clock-frequency = <111111111>;
> + };
That clock-frequency looks a little odd. Is that right?
I haven't taken an in-depth look at the other nodes. They look sane at a
high-level, and assuming they are all already documented and supported
they look fine to me.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
