On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:56:01 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Add two helper functions to help drivers that are sharing IRQs with
> timer devices (or other devices setting the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag) deal
> with system wakeup and state detection.
>
> Such drivers should expect their IRQ handler to be called in 2 different
> contexts:
> 1/ the system is resumed and the handler should act normally
> 2/ the system is suspended and the handler should wake it up, and
> potentially save the received events so that they could be taken care
> of when the resume callback is called
>
> irq_is_wakeup_armed provides mean to test the current state (true means
> the system is suspended).
>
> irq_pm_force_wakeup provides mean to force a system wakeup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/pm.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> index d9b05b5..052a3b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,9 @@ static inline int disable_irq_wake(unsigned int irq)
> return irq_set_irq_wake(irq, 0);
> }
>
> +bool irq_is_wakeup_armed(unsigned int irq);
> +
> +void irq_pm_force_wakeup(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> extern bool force_irqthreads;
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 196a06f..5424be0 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,22 @@ int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_set_irq_wake);
>
> +bool irq_is_wakeup_armed(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags,
> IRQ_GET_DESC_CHECK_GLOBAL);
> + bool ret;
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return false;
> +
> + ret = irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data);
> +
> + irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_is_wakeup_armed);
Ugly that is ...
> +
> /*
> * Internal function that tells the architecture code whether a
> * particular irq has been exclusively allocated or is available
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> index 1743162..1110a37 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ bool irq_pm_check_wakeup(struct irq_desc *desc)
> return false;
> }
>
> +void irq_pm_force_wakeup(void)
> +{
> + pm_system_wakeup();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_pm_force_wakeup);
Why don't you export pm_system_wakeup() instead and use it directly?
> +
> /*
> * Called from __setup_irq() with desc->lock held after @action has
> * been installed in the action chain.
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
