On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ? > > I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch > from Mark Rutland if you ACK it for me. :-) Works for me, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> > > Also, should we warn if people use enable_irq_wake() where there is only > > a single descriptor with NO_SUSPEND? > > We probably should do that, but that would be a separate patch IMO? Agreed. Just wanted to raise the point. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
