On 03/02/15 06:55, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> There is nothing platform dependent in the core memtest code, so other 
> platform
> might benefit of this feature too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.mur...@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig            |   11 ----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h |    8 ---
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile        |    2 -
>  arch/x86/mm/memtest.c       |  118 
> -------------------------------------------
>  include/linux/memblock.h    |    8 +++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug           |   11 ++++
>  mm/Makefile                 |    1 +
>  mm/memtest.c                |  118 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
>  create mode 100644 mm/memtest.c

> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index c5cefb3..8eb064fd 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1732,6 +1732,17 @@ config TEST_UDELAY
>  
>         If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config MEMTEST
> +     bool "Memtest"
> +     ---help---
> +       This option adds a kernel parameter 'memtest', which allows memtest
> +       to be set.
> +             memtest=0, mean disabled; -- default
> +             memtest=1, mean do 1 test pattern;
> +             ...
> +             memtest=4, mean do 4 test patterns.

This sort of implies a max of 4 test patterns, but it seems to be 17
if I counted correctly, so if someone wants to test all of the possible
'memtest' patterns, they would need to use 'memtest=17', is that correct?


> +       If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.

Thanks,
-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to