Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors,
so relax the checks to avoid regressions.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/resource.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
index c723668e3e27..5589a6e2a023 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, 
u64 len, bool io)
         * CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum
         * length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does
         * not make any sense at all.
+        * Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space
+        * descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression.
         */
-       if (len && reslen && reslen == len && start <= end)
+       if (len && reslen && start <= end)
                return true;
 
        pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] 
length [%016llx]\n",
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to