Hi Xishi,
On 03/03/2015 11:30 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:

> When hot-remove a numa node, we will clear pgdat,
> but is memset 0 safe in try_offline_node()?

It is not safe here. In fact, this is a temporary solution here.
As you know, pgdat is accessed lock-less now, so protection
mechanism (RCU?) is needed to make it completely safe here,
but it seems a bit over-kill.

> 
> process A:                    offline node XX:
> for_each_populated_zone()
> find online node XX
> cond_resched()
>                               offline cpu and memory, then try_offline_node()
>                               node_set_offline(nid), and memset(pgdat, 0, 
> sizeof(*pgdat))
> access node XX's pgdat
> NULL pointer access error

It's possible, but I did not meet this condition, did you?

Regards,
Gu

> 
> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to